Ethical Teachings of Jesus Christ
Jesus
came not to destroy the law but to fulfil it (Matt 5:17, 18).
This means, on the one hand, that He endorsed it. This He did, first, by
yielding to it an obedience that was unique. Not only in moral matters but also
in its wider connotation, Jesus abode by the law (Matt 17:27; 23:23; Mark 14:12).
Second, He endorsed its teaching, subsuming all under the twofold head of love
to God and neighbour (Matt 22:37-40).
Ethical
obligation, according to the Saviour's teachings, is enforced by the yet higher
religious obligation. Our duties to men are really a part of our
all-comprehensive duty to God. Why must I love my neighbour as
myself? If it be placed on utilitarian grounds, meaning personal utility, then
I ought to love my neighbour as myself because it will benefit me, that is,
because I love myself better than my neighbour. If the utility consulted be
general, then why ought I to care as much for the general good as for
my own? We are back where we started. Herbert Spencer, with all the ability and
earnestness shown in his "Data of Ethics" makes a reply which I think
men in general cannot recognize as philosophically conclusive or practically
cogent. Natural sympathy with others, we are told, if frequently exercised,
hardens by force of habit into altruism, a sense of obligation to others. Is
that all? Nay, I must love my neighbour as myself because I am the creature and
the child of God, whom I must love with all my heart, more than my neighbour
and more than myself. Shall we then, it may be asked, accuse every man who is
not definitely religious of being gravely immoral? Nay, individual moral
convictions may be largely the result of inheritance, education and present
environment, and may subsist notwithstanding the individual lack of those
religious convictions which are their proper, and, as a general fact, their
actual support.
In
His summary of the law, Jesus provided also a summary of His positive ethical
teaching. This is found in the command to love God and neighbor (Matt 22:37-39)
and the Golden Rule (7:12).
Despite parallels in Judaism, such teaching was nonetheless unique. Here alone,
love to God and love to neighbor are specifically linked together and related
to each other. Furthermore, the command to love is given unprecedented
preeminence in the teaching of Jesus. Rabbi Akiba may have quoted the OT (Lev 19:18)
as the summation of the teaching of the law, but he saw it as standing
alongside the rest of the law, both written and oral. Hillel may have used the
Golden Rule, but only in its negative form. Moreover, Jesus radicalized love by
revealing love in its fullest meaning—not only in His teaching, but also in His
life. In particular, He universalized the meaning of love by specifically
extending the term “neighbor” beyond the bounds of those who have a claim upon
us (Luke 10:29-37;
cf. Matt 5:43-47).
This He demonstrated in His own life through His compassion.
Comments
Post a Comment